![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Many have written about this bias, and it appears to be sufficiently strong and pervasive that one is led to wonder whether the bias, by itself, might account for a significant fraction of the disputes, altercations, and misun- derstandings that occur among individuals, groups, and nations. Black Faces, White Spaces Reimagining the Relationship of African Americans to the Great Outdoors. 41) If one were to attempt to identify a single problematic aspect of human reasoning that deserves attention above all others, the confirma- tion bias would have to be among the candidates for consideration. 552) Confirmation bias is perhaps the best known and most widely accepted notion of inferential error to come out of the literature on human reasoning. When men wish to construct or support a theory, how they torture facts into their service! (Mackay, 1852/ 1932, p. Possible explanations are considered, and the question of its utility or disutility is discussed. The author reviews evidence of such a bias in a variety of guises and gives examples of its operation in several practical contexts. Confirmation bias, as the term is typically used in the psychological literature, connotes the seeking or interpreting of evidence in ways that are partial to existing beliefs, expectations, or a hypothesis in hand. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |